It  looks like space was expanding much slower billion years ago.

It's not correct, This theory will show that relative distances (the meter stick) is also effected by the expanding space, and is now relative much "longer" as previously, (but in fact it is still 1 metre).

These statements will be further covered in this and following chapters.

The strong force seems to be an inevitable result of what once probably only was chaotic spinning particle, and hence collective coherent osculation frequencies due to opposite spin of space whirls. However the force of gravity is caused by the total amount of contracted space that the strong interaction always keeps together, which mean that the strong force and gravity must be united.  

Based on the Hubble Constant we should expect that also distances (here) inside a gravitational field expands. But because this is not what are observed the conclusion (so fare) is that the force of mass attraction “is stronger” as the expanding Universe.  This conclusion seems to be doomed to overturn. 

When the expected central gravity measurement confirms that ADG not is decreasing towards the centre of an object, but stable, - this should be enough to determinate that the expression; “curvature of space” rather must be understood as “stretching space”, - and hence is the exact same property of space responsible for the “the expanding / stretching Universe”.  Which hence mean; that gravity and the expanding space are united, as it is caused by one and the same property.

The first place such unification “strikes” is that the property responsible for both gravity and the expanding universe can in no way counteract / oppose it self. This off course must mean that space between astronomic bodies must expand too. But since this is not what we observe, the conclusion must be that also space inside matter must expand proportional with the expanding universe. Even the meter-stick also expands proportional with the rest of the Universe; we have no way to prove that everything is expanding with the same rate. (Or in other words; everything expands proportional with its already existing “stretch” factor”).

One more consequence of the unification of gravity and the expanding Universe is that time dilation that applies for gravity (GR) also must comprehend the expanding Universe.

This means that when the universe (and everything in it) was only half the size as now, time was ticking double so fast.  Both time (the second) and distances (the meter stick) has since both been “stretching” proportional, without any direct observable possibility to discover it.

Hence the Cosmologic redshift we see in the EM-spectre is not caused due to the distance-expansion, because 1 meter today, - (is even though it is relative double so big today compared to the example), it is still (only) one meter.

According to the prevailing understanding, it is believed that photon loses energy when travelling through space. It is believed that the energy either disappears or converts to gravity.   But as we can easy see there is no such energy lost, but only time differences.  When we look at light reaching us from distance stars we are not looking back on previous distances,-  but rather we are only looking back in time.

It is also believed that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, - the so called Dark Energy.   This is a wrong conclusion based on a “optical illusion”, - due to that we not are aware that it rather is the meter-stick that is expanding proportional with the expanding Universe.  Seen in such perspective (the universe is of course expanding) but not accelerating.

From General Relativity we know that time and distances both are “stretching” towards an object.  But because also the meter-stick is stretching proportional, it means that the Mercury orbit anomaly can’t be solved. 

Let's say; Observer "A" live in a space time ticking double so fast as for observer "B"

In on second Observer "A" counts 5 Hz in a photon.
Observer "B" counts 10 Hz per second in another photon..

If Observer "A" also could see the photon in Observer "B's" space-time, he would counts the frequency duration to 2 seconds, but the photons frequency in his own space-time would only last 1 second. Hence Observer A would conclude both photons had the same energy.

Observer "B" would also agree that also the photon in Observer "A" space-time had the same energy than the one in Observer "B's" space-time", although the duration of the photon in observer "A's" space-time only would appear to last ½ second.

Based on Planck's constant we would hence easy conclude that both photons always had the same energy (per second), - even though the frequencies (and time) are different.
 

This mean if time is double so fast, by observer "A", - a photon here, (by observer "B") with the double numbers of frequencies, (and double "stretch" of time) will have the same energy as a photon with the half number of frequencies in Observer "A's" reality.

Therefore time (space-time) is decisive for that photons with difference frequencies are absorbed in different space-time..
 

Now imaging that both observer measure 1 meter between each wavelength.
But when Observer "B" would use his meter stick to measure the wavelength of the photon in Observer "A's" space-time, he would only measure the half distance (2.5 meter, not 5 meter) - (if we assume the Universe was only half the size in Observer "A's" space-time).
 

Now imaging that this photon (from Observer "A's" space-time) would move in the universe 1 billion years, until we (Observer "B") would measure it - In that billion years the Universe have expanded to the double size, and so have the photons wavelength, now is the distance between of the total wavelength suddenly 5 meter.

But time is no longer the same as when the photons energy was measured by Observer "A" , - In the billion year the journey have taken, time has also "stretched" to the double "size", - and this mean the photon measured in the "new time", (by Observer "B") "suddenly" only have the half energy.
 

THIS is how to understand cosmological redshift.

• Photons do NEVER lose energy.

• Photons do NEVER gain energy.

Time and distance are changing proportional with anything else.
 

THIS was the secret of cosmological redshift.
 

Photon absorptions spectre are "time stamps" send from different space-time.

Photons do not "carry time", - they are measured in time, or absorbed in time.

THIS is a consequence of uniting stretched space (the curvature of space) (GR) with the expanding nature of the expanding Universe

Measurements from the satellite XMM Newton have shown that younger clusters of galaxies (those which formed 10 Billion years ago) where bigger than clusters of galaxies formed later. This was concluded because younger clusters of galaxies emit less x-ray radiation. Measurements also show that in the past there were fewer clusters of galaxies than today. Read More

These observations came as a shock for older theories, but can easily be explained by applying our contraction of space theory.

The facts give us reason to ask: How is the universe pulling apart? - The force driving the expansion of the universe affects space from all sites simultaneously.

Now imagine 6 small galaxy clusters (illustration above) united in a greater cluster. This will help you to imagine, on a grander scale, thousands of small clusters of galaxy bound by a common field of gravity.

The force behind the expansion of the universe, has increased the volume of very huge cluster of galaxies that existed in the younger days of our universe.

Maybe our universe was initially split into a few very large parts..

In the young universe, when huge clusters were split huge empty holes were left in the middle of where these galaxy clusters once were. This is exactly what has happened. >

• Empty Hole in Universe Discovered

• Hole a billion light-years across discovered